Connect with us
We’re experimenting with AI-generated content to help deliver information faster and more efficiently.
While we try to keep things accurate, this content is part of an ongoing experiment and may not always be reliable.
Please double-check important details — we’re not responsible for how the information is used.

Drought Research

Forever Chemicals Remain in California Adults’ Drinking Water and Food

A new study examined associations between diet, drinking water, and ‘legacy’ PFAS — chemicals that were phased out of production in the US in the 2000s — with blood samples from California residents. PFAS exposure was associated with consumption of seafood, eggs, and brown rice, but fewer other foods than suggested by earlier studies. PFAS levels were elevated among people who lived in areas where these chemicals were detectable in their drinking water supply, but lower than levels found in highly contaminated communities.

Avatar photo

Published

on

While concentrations of older “forever” chemicals appear to have decreased in many foods over the last two decades, a new study found that drinking water, along with seafood, eggs, and brown rice, still contribute to PFAS exposure in adults. More attention is needed to newer, replacement PFAS.

Food has long been considered a major source of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a large class of long-lasting chemicals used in industry, consumer products, and found in the environment that are hazardous to human health. A new study led by Boston University School of Public Health researchers reveals that PFAS exposure through food appears to have declined among adults over the last two decades — but drinking water remains an important source of these chemicals.

Published in the journal Environmental Science & Technology, the study examined associations between diet, drinking water, and “legacy” PFAS — chemicals that were phased out of production in the US in the 2000s — with blood samples from California residents. PFAS exposure was associated with consumption of seafood, eggs, and brown rice, but fewer other foods than suggested by earlier studies. PFAS levels were elevated among people who lived in areas where these chemicals were detectable in their drinking water supply, but lower than levels found in highly contaminated communities.

The findings published the same day the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced that it will roll back first-ever limits on certain types of PFAS in drinking water, set by the Biden administration last year. The EPA also said it will uphold drinking water standards for two of the most harmful forever chemicals — PFOA and PFOS — but extended the deadline for water utilities’ compliance with these rules, from 2029 to 2031.

The study provides the first analysis of the effects of diet and drinking water simultaneously on PFAS concentrations in blood, and it fills a critical gap in research on this topic. Most US information on PFAS in food relies on earlier European studies that cannot be fully applied to the US population or lifestyle due to differences in time of sampling, diet, food production, and industries. To understand and mitigate the harmful effects of PFAS on individuals and the environment, the US needs current data on the possible contributing sources of exposure.

While we observed fewer dietary associations compared to previous studies, diet and water may still be an important source of exposure in the general population,” says study lead and corresponding author Dr. Emily Pennoyer, a graduate of BUSPH’s environmental health PhD program, and a student at the time of the study. “These findings emphasize the need to continue ongoing efforts to regulate PFAS in drinking water.”

Known as “forever chemicals” because they are difficult to break down, some PFAS are linked to a number of diseases and other health conditions, including multiple cancers, liver damage, thyroid disease, decreased vaccine response, and developmental and reproductive complications.

For the study, Dr. Pennoyer and colleagues at BUSPH, the California Department of Public Health (CDPH), and California Department of Toxic Substances Control estimated associations among legacy serum PFAS concentrations, self-reported food consumption, and PFAS concentrations in public drinking water supplies. The 700 adult participants were selected from the California Regional Exposure Study, conducted from 2018-2020, which measures and compares environmental chemicals in people across the state to better understand how to reduce chemical exposure and improve public health.

The participants provided survey responses detailing demographic information and the frequency in which they consume red meat, poultry, seafood, dairy, eggs, potatoes, brown rice, takeout, and cosmetics. The researchers analyzed blood samples for PFAS levels and found associations between PFAS concentrations and certain food groups, including seafood, eggs, and brown rice.

The study’s findings have important implications for public health policy and individual consumer choices. “Our results further support the importance of upholding the federal drinking water standards promulgated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency,” says study coauthor Dr. Wendy Heiger-Bernays, emeritus clinical professor of environmental health at BUSPH.

Consumers can make informed choices by purchasing products labeled “fluoro-free” when possible, she adds. “More research is needed on indoor exposures to air, dust, and cosmetics, as well as analyses of newer, non-legacy PFAS,” says study senior author Dr. Thomas Webster, professor of environmental health at BUSPH.

“Our findings further support the importance of addressing PFAS contamination in drinking water supplies,” says study coauthor Dr. Kathleen Attfield, head of the Biomonitoring California, Exposure Surveillance and Epidemiology Unit at CDPH. “We hope that these results will inform policy decisions and help to reduce exposure to these hazardous chemicals.”

Atmosphere

Biofilms Hold Key to Stopping Microplastic Build-up in Rivers and Oceans

Where do microplastics really go after entering the environment? MIT researchers discovered that sticky biofilms naturally produced by bacteria play a surprising role in preventing microplastics from accumulating in riverbeds. Instead of trapping the particles, these biofilms actually keep them loose and exposed, making them easier for flowing water to carry away. This insight could help target cleanup efforts more effectively and identify hidden pollution hotspots.

Avatar photo

Published

on

The accumulation of microplastics in our environment is a growing concern. These tiny particles have been found to harm marine life, contaminate food chains, and even enter our own bodies through various pathways. However, predicting where these particles will accumulate and therefore where remediation efforts should focus has been difficult due to the many factors contributing to their dispersal and deposition.

New research from MIT shows that one key factor in determining where microparticles are likely to build up is related to the presence of biofilms. These thin, sticky biopolymer layers are shed by microorganisms and can accumulate on surfaces, including riverbeds or seashores. The study found that when these particles land on sediment infused with biofilms, they are more likely to be resuspended by flowing water and carried away.

The research involved a flow tank with a bottom lined with fine sand, sometimes mixed with biological material simulating natural biofilms. Water mixed with tiny plastic particles was pumped through the tank for three hours, and then the bed surface was photographed under ultraviolet light that caused the plastic particles to fluoresce, allowing a quantitative measurement of their concentration.

The results revealed two different phenomena affecting how much plastic accumulated on the different surfaces. Immediately around the rods simulating above-ground roots, turbulence prevented particle deposition. Additionally, as the amount of simulated biofilms in the sediment bed increased, the accumulation of particles also decreased.

The researchers concluded that the biofilms filled up the spaces between the sand grains, leaving less room for the microparticles to fit in. The particles were more exposed because they penetrated less deeply into the sand grains, making them easier to resuspend and carry away by the flowing water.

This research provides a “nice lens” to offer guidance on where to find microplastic hotspots versus not-so-hot areas. For example, in mangrove ecosystems, microplastics may accumulate preferentially in the outer edges, which tend to be sandy, while the interior zones have sediment with more biofilm. This suggests that the sandy outer regions may be potential hotspots for microplastic accumulation.

The work was supported by Shell International Exploration and Production through the MIT Energy Initiative. While other factors like turbulence or roughness of the bottom surface complicate this, it provides a framework to categorize habitats and prioritize monitoring and protection efforts.

Continue Reading

Drought

The Double Whammy of Extreme Weather and Habitat Loss on Amphibians

Frogs, salamanders, and other amphibians are not just battling habitat loss and pollution they’re now also contending with increasingly brutal heat waves and droughts. A sweeping 40-year study shows a direct link between the rise in extreme weather events and the growing number of species landing on the endangered list. Europe, the Amazon, and Madagascar have become danger zones, with amphibians unable to adapt quickly enough. But there s hope scientists are calling for focused conservation efforts like habitat restoration and micro-refuges to help these vulnerable creatures survive.

Avatar photo

Published

on

The article reveals that extreme weather events are exacerbating the decline of amphibian populations worldwide. A study from the Institute for Ecology, Evolution, and Diversity analyzed global weather data over 40 years to determine how heat waves, droughts, and cold spells have affected the geographical distribution of more than 7,000 amphibian species.

The results show a clear correlation between increased extreme weather events and deteriorating threat status on the Red List. Dr. Evan Twomey, lead author of the study, explains that amphibians’ dependence on temporary wetlands for breeding makes them vulnerable to droughts and temperature shifts. “Our analyses show the direct connection between the increase in extreme weather events and the decline of amphibian populations,” he states.

Three regions are particularly affected: Europe, where droughts have taken a toll on salamander populations; the Amazon region, where heat waves have impacted frog species; and Madagascar, where both heat waves and droughts have had devastating effects. In Central Europe, future climate projections indicate an increase in drought periods, further exacerbating the situation for native true salamanders.

The study highlights the urgent need for targeted conservation measures to protect threatened amphibian species. These include creating small protected areas and improving wetlands to ensure optimal living conditions. Creating moist retreat sites, such as using pipes or boards, also provides these animals with opportunities to withdraw during dry periods.

As indicators of ecosystem health, the protection of amphibians is paramount for preserving biodiversity. The study’s findings provide essential foundations for adapted conservation strategies in particularly affected regions, emphasizing the importance of taking action to mitigate the devastating impact of extreme weather and habitat loss on amphibian populations.

Continue Reading

Acid Rain

The Hidden Impact of Anoxic Pockets on Sandy Shores

Some microbes living on sand grains use up all the oxygen around them. Their neighbors, left without oxygen, make the best of it: They use nitrate in the surrounding water for denitrification — a process hardly possible when oxygen is present. This denitrification in sandy sediments in well-oxygenated waters can substantially contribute to nitrogen loss in the oceans.

Avatar photo

Published

on

The Hidden Impact of Anoxic Pockets on Sandy Shores

Human activities have dramatically increased nitrogen inputs into coastal seas, leading to a significant amount of this human-derived nitrogen being removed by microorganisms in coastal sands through denitrification. However, research has shown that this process can also occur in oxygenated sands, and scientists from the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology in Bremen, Germany, have now revealed how this happens.

The scientists used a method called microfluidic imaging to visualize the diverse and uneven distribution of microbes and the oxygen dynamics on extremely small scales. “Tens of thousands of microorganisms live on a single grain of sand,” explains Farooq Moin Jalaluddin from the Max Planck Institute for Marine Microbiology. The researchers could show that some microbes consume more oxygen than is resupplied by the surrounding pore water, creating anoxic pockets on the surface of the sand grains.

These anoxic microenvironments have so far been invisible to conventional techniques but have a dramatic effect: “Our estimates based on model simulations show that anaerobic denitrification in these anoxic pockets can account for up to one-third of the total denitrification in oxygenated sands,” says Jalaluddin.

The researchers calculated how relevant this newly researched form of nitrogen removal is on a global scale and found that it could account for up to one-third of total nitrogen loss in silicate shelf sands. Consequently, this denitrification is a substantial sink for anthropogenic nitrogen entering the oceans.

In conclusion, the hidden impact of anoxic pockets on sandy shores has been revealed by scientists, highlighting the importance of these microenvironments in removing nitrogen from coastal seas and emphasizing the need to consider them when assessing the overall nitrogen budget of our planet.

Continue Reading

Trending