Connect with us
We’re experimenting with AI-generated content to help deliver information faster and more efficiently.
While we try to keep things accurate, this content is part of an ongoing experiment and may not always be reliable.
Please double-check important details — we’re not responsible for how the information is used.

Earth & Climate

Should We Protect Non-Native Species? A New Study Says It’s Complicated

A new study found that over a quarter of the world’s naturalized plant species are threatened in parts of their native range — raising questions about the role non-native populations may play in global conservation efforts.

Avatar photo

Published

on

The world has long considered non-native plant species to be a threat to native flora and fauna. However, a new study published in New Phytologist challenges this notion by revealing that over a quarter of naturalized plant species worldwide are struggling to survive in their original ranges – raising questions about the role these non-native populations may play in global conservation efforts.

The research team, led by Dr. Ingmar Staude from the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), Leipzig University, and the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research — UFZ, analyzed data from 103 countries and found that 27% of naturalized plant species are threatened somewhere in their native range.

A striking example of this conservation conundrum is Agave vera-cruz, a plant species that is globally classified as extinct in the wild due to its native-range threats. However, it thrives in multiple self-sustaining non-native populations. This scenario highlights the dynamic nature of species ranges and the need for a more nuanced approach to evaluating non-native species.

While some may argue that non-native species should be eradicated due to their ecological impact, this study advocates for a more balanced perspective. The researchers suggest that some plant species colonizing new regions may provide conservation value, although each case requires careful evaluation.

As climate change and land use alter species distributions, ever more such conservation dilemmas will emerge. The researchers emphasize the importance of reassessing the rigid distinction between “native” and “non-native” species in the context of global biodiversity change.

Ultimately, this study implies that non-native species should not be viewed as solely a threat or a benefit but rather as a complex entity that requires individual evaluation based on their specific circumstances. By adopting a more balanced perspective, we may uncover new opportunities for conservation and better protect our planet’s precious biodiversity.

Chemistry

“Rewriting Chemistry with Light: A Breakthrough in Fossil Fuel Transformation”

Researchers at Colorado State University have developed a new photoredox catalysis system that uses visible light mimicking photosynthesis to drive energy-intensive chemical reactions at room temperature. This groundbreaking process could significantly reduce the energy required in chemical manufacturing, especially in industries reliant on fossil fuels.

Avatar photo

Published

on

By

The world is on the cusp of a revolutionary change in the way we transform fossil fuels into useful modern chemicals. Researchers at Colorado State University have made a groundbreaking discovery that uses light to rewrite the chemistry of fossil fuels, reducing energy demands and associated pollution. This breakthrough, published in Science, could be a game-changer for industries reliant on chemical manufacturing.

At the forefront of this research are professors Garret Miyake and Robert Paton from the Department of Chemistry and the Center for Sustainable Photoredox Catalysis (SuPRCat). Inspired by photosynthesis, their organic photoredox catalysis system harnesses visible light to gently alter the properties of chemical compounds. By exposing them to two separate photons, the team’s system generates energy needed for desired reactions, performing super-reducing reactions that are normally difficult and energy-intensive.

The research has shown remarkable results on aromatic hydrocarbons – resistant compounds like benzene in fossil fuels. Miyake boasts that their technology is “the most efficient system currently available” for reducing these compounds, paving the way for the production of chemicals needed for plastics and medicine.

This work continues the efforts of the U.S. National Science Foundation Center for Sustainable Photoredox Catalysis at CSU, led by Miyake as its director. This multi-institution research effort aims to transform chemical synthesis processes across various uses, making synthetic and computational chemists team up to understand the fundamental chemical nature of photoredox catalysis.

Katharine Covert, program director for the NSF Centers for Chemical Innovation program, highlights the importance of photoredox catalysis in pharmaceutical development and other industries. Through the NSF Center for Sustainable Photoredox Catalysis, researchers are developing catalysis systems similar to the one described in this paper to support energy-efficient production of ammonia for fertilizers, the breakdown of PFAS forever chemicals, and the upcycling of plastics.

Miyake emphasizes the urgency of meeting these challenges and making a more sustainable future for our world. He concludes that “the world has a timeclock that is expiring,” and we must develop sustainable technologies before it’s too late.

This breakthrough has far-reaching implications, not just in chemical manufacturing but also in addressing pressing environmental concerns. As researchers continue to push the boundaries of what’s possible with light-based chemistry, one thing is certain – the future of fossil fuel transformation has never looked brighter.

Continue Reading

Agriculture and Food

The Unexpected Sinking Speed of Ocean Particles: A Surprising Twist on Marine Snow

In a twist on conventional wisdom, researchers have discovered that in ocean-like fluids with changing density, tiny porous particles can sink faster than larger ones, thanks to how they absorb salt. Using clever lab experiments with 3D-printed agar shapes in a stratified water column, scientists demonstrated that porosity and particle shape are major factors in determining sinking speed. This finding could revolutionize how we understand carbon cycling, microplastic behavior, and even strategies for ocean-based carbon capture.

Avatar photo

Published

on

The deep ocean can be a breathtaking sight to behold, resembling a real-life snow globe. As organic particles from plant and animal matter on the surface sink downward, they combine with dust and other material to create “marine snow,” a crucial component in cycling carbon and nutrients through the world’s oceans. However, researchers from Brown University and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill have recently uncovered surprising new insights into how these particles settle in the ocean.

In a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, they found that the speed at which particles sink is not solely determined by resistive drag forces from the fluid, but also by their ability to absorb salt relative to their volume. This discovery challenges conventional wisdom and could have significant implications for understanding natural carbon cycling and even engineering ways of speeding up carbon capture.

“It basically means that smaller particles can sink faster than bigger ones,” said Robert Hunt, a postdoctoral researcher in Brown’s School of Engineering who led the work. “That’s exactly the opposite of what you’d expect in a fluid with uniform density.”

The researchers created a linearly stratified body of water to test their model and found that particles with high porosity tended to sink faster than those with lower porosity, regardless of their size. This means that elongated particles actually sink faster than spherical ones of the same volume.

“We ended up with a pretty simple formula where you can plug in estimates for different parameters – the size of the particles or speed at which the liquid density changes – and get reasonable estimates of the sinking speed,” said Daniel Harris, an associate professor of engineering at Brown who oversaw the work. “There’s value in having predictive power that’s readily accessible.”

The study grew out of prior work by Hunt and Harris investigating neutrally buoyant particles, and their new findings have the potential to revolutionize our understanding of how particles settle in complex ecological settings.

“We’re not trying to replicate full oceanic conditions,” Harris said. “The approach in our lab is to boil things down to their simplest form and think about the fundamental physics involved in these complex phenomena. Then we can work back and forth with people measuring these things in the field to understand where these fundamentals are relevant.”

Harris hopes to connect with oceanographers and climate scientists to see what insights these new findings might provide, and other co-authors of the research were Roberto Camassa and Richard McLaughlin from UNC Chapel Hill. The research was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Office of Naval Research.

Continue Reading

Acid Rain

Uncovering the Hidden Depths of Plant Roots: A New Perspective on Carbon Storage

Beneath the forest floor lies an overlooked secret: many plants grow a second set of roots far deeper than expected sometimes over three feet down tapping into hidden nutrient stores and potentially locking away carbon. A new study using deep-soil data from NEON reveals that these “bimodal” rooting systems are more common than previously believed and may play a powerful role in stabilizing ecosystems and fighting climate change.

Avatar photo

Published

on

Plants and trees have long been known to extend their roots into the earth in search of nutrients and water. However, a new study has revealed that many plants develop a second, deeper layer of roots – often more than three feet underground – to access additional nourishment. This discovery, published in the journal Nature Communications, changes our understanding of how ecosystems respond to changing environmental conditions.

The research team, led by Mingzhen Lu from New York University’s Department of Environmental Studies, used data from the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) to examine rooting depth. By digging deeper than traditional ecological studies – up to 6.5 feet below the surface – they detected additional root patterns in diverse climate zones and ecosystem types.

The scientists’ work focused on three key questions: How do plants acquire resources? What strategies do they employ to adapt to environmental change? And what are the implications for carbon storage?

Their findings were striking: nearly 20 percent of the studied ecosystems had roots that peaked twice across depth – a phenomenon called “bimodality.” In these cases, plants developed a second, deeper layer of roots, often aligning with nutrient-rich soil layers. This suggests that plants have been growing in previously unknown ways to exploit additional sustenance.

The study’s lead author, Mingzhen Lu, observes that the current understanding of roots is “literally too shallow.” By not looking deep enough, we may have overlooked a natural carbon storage mechanism deep underground. The research opens up new avenues for inquiry into how bimodal rooting patterns impact the dynamics of nutrient flow, water cycling, and long-term soil carbon stock.

As scientists and policymakers look to manage ecosystems in a rapidly changing climate, they must consider these overlooked deep soil layers. The study concludes that plants may already be naturally mitigating climate change more actively than we’ve realized – we just need to dig deeper to fully understand their potential.

Continue Reading

Trending