The fascinating world of bird feeding behaviors has been further explored by researchers, who have discovered that Chilean flamingos use their unique beak and foot structure to create water tornados and skimming techniques to trap their prey.

Victor Ortega Jiménez, an assistant professor at the University of California, Berkeley, and his collaborators have published a study in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences detailing how these birds employ various strategies to capture brine shrimp, a crucial food source for them.

One of the key findings is that flamingos use their floppy webbed feet to churn up the water and create vortices around their beaks. This allows them to concentrate particles of food and increase their chances of capturing prey.

Another technique employed by flamingos is skimming, which involves moving the lower beak in a rapid chattering motion to create symmetrical vortices on either side of the beak. This helps to recirculate particles in the water and bring them into the beak, making it easier for the bird to capture its prey.

The study also highlights the importance of fluid dynamics in understanding how flamingos feed. Researchers employed computational fluid dynamics to simulate the 3D flow around the beak and feet, confirming that the vortices do indeed concentrate particles, similar to experiments using a 3D-printed head in a flume.

This research has significant implications for our understanding of bird feeding behaviors and could potentially inform the design of robots that need to navigate water or muddy environments.

The human capacity for language has long been considered unique to our species. However, recent studies have challenged this notion by revealing that chimpanzees possess a complex communication system that rivals that of humans in terms of its combinatorial potential. Researchers from the Max Planck Institutes for Evolutionary Anthropology and Cognitive and Brain Sciences, along with colleagues from the Cognitive Neuroscience Center Marc Jeannerod and Neuroscience Research Center in Lyon, France, have recorded thousands of vocalizations from wild chimpanzees in the Taï National Park in Ivory Coast.

Their findings reveal that chimpanzees employ four distinct methods to alter meanings when combining single calls into two-call combinations. These include compositional and non-compositional combinations, analogous to the key linguistic principles in human language. The study also highlights the versatility of these combinations, which are used in a wide range of contexts beyond mere predator alerts.

One of the most significant aspects of this research is that it suggests that chimpanzees’ complex communication system may be more similar to human language than previously thought. This has implications for our understanding of the origins of language and the evolutionary history of humans. The study’s authors propose that the capacity for complex combinatorial capacities was already present in the common ancestor of humans and great apes, challenging the views of the last century that communication in great apes is fixed and linked to emotional states.

This research opens up new avenues for investigation into the evolution of language and highlights the importance of studying the communicative capabilities of our closest living relatives. As Cédric Girard-Buttoz, first author on the study, notes, “Our findings suggest a highly generative vocal communication system, unprecedented in the animal kingdom… This changes the views of the last century which considered communication in the great apes to be fixed and linked to emotional states, and therefore unable to tell us anything about the evolution of language.”

The fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) has long been a model organism for scientists studying genetics, development, and behavior. However, despite its importance, the intricacies of the fruit fly’s nervous system have remained somewhat of a mystery – until now. Researchers at Leipzig University and other institutions have made a groundbreaking discovery, publishing a study in Nature that provides comprehensive insights into the entire nervous system of the adult fruit fly.

For the first time, scientists have mapped out the neural connections (the connectome) in a female and a male specimen, revealing differences between the two sexes. This breakthrough is a significant step forward in understanding the complex interactions within the fruit fly’s brain and nervous system.

The study, led by Dr. Katharina Eichler from Leipzig University, involved analyzing three connectomes: one female brain data set and two nerve cord data sets (one male, one female). The researchers used light microscopy to identify all neurons in the neck of the fruit fly that could be visualized using this technique.

This allowed them to analyze the circuits formed by these cells in their entirety. When comparing male and female neurons, the scientists identified sex-specific differences for the first time. They found previously unknown cells that exist only in one sex and are absent in the other.

One notable example is a descending neuron known as aSP22, which communicates with neurons present only in females. This finding provides an explanation for the behavioral differences observed when this neuron is active: female flies extend their abdomen to lay eggs, while males curl theirs forward to mate.

The study’s findings are significant not only because they provide a comprehensive overview of the fruit fly connectome but also because they offer a “roadmap” for future research. By understanding the intricate connections within the nervous system, scientists can design more intelligent experiments to investigate the function of individual neurons or entire circuits – saving time and resources.

As Eichler notes, now that the technical challenges in analyzing the fruit fly’s nervous system have been overcome, her research group is working on two new data sets covering the entire central nervous system of both a female and a male specimen. This continued research will undoubtedly shed more light on the complexities of the fruit fly brain and its implications for our understanding of nervous systems in general.