The world’s oceans have long been thought to be a vast, plastic-free expanse. However, recent research has revealed a shocking truth – our seas are home to an estimated 27 million tons of tiny plastic particles, known as nanoplastics. This staggering amount is the result of a collaborative effort between ocean scientists and atmospheric researchers from Utrecht University.

The discovery was made possible by the work of Sophie ten Hietbrink, a master’s student who spent four weeks aboard the research vessel RV Pelagia, collecting water samples at 12 locations across the North Atlantic. Using mass spectrometry in the laboratory, she was able to detect and quantify the characteristic molecules of different types of plastics present in the ocean.

According to Helge Niemann, a researcher at NIOZ and professor of geochemistry at Utrecht University, this estimate is the first of its kind. “Until now, there were only a few publications that showed nanoplastics existed in the ocean water,” he said. “But we have never been able to estimate the amount until now.”

The consequences of this revelation are profound. Nanoplastics can penetrate deep into our bodies and have even been found in brain tissue. Now that their ubiquity in oceans has been confirmed, it’s likely they will contaminate every level of the ecosystem – from bacteria and microorganisms to fish and top predators like humans.

While cleaning up the existing nanoplastics is impossible, researchers emphasize that preventing further pollution with plastics is essential. Niemann emphasizes this crucial message: “We should at least prevent the further pollution of our environment with plastics.”

Future research will focus on understanding the different types of plastics present in nanoplastics and their distribution across other oceans. As we continue to explore the complexities of plastic pollution, it’s clear that a concerted effort is needed to protect our planet from these insidious invaders – even if they’re as small as a nanometer.

Plants and trees have long been known to extend their roots into the earth in search of nutrients and water. However, a new study has revealed that many plants develop a second, deeper layer of roots – often more than three feet underground – to access additional nourishment. This discovery, published in the journal Nature Communications, changes our understanding of how ecosystems respond to changing environmental conditions.

The research team, led by Mingzhen Lu from New York University’s Department of Environmental Studies, used data from the National Ecological Observatory Network (NEON) to examine rooting depth. By digging deeper than traditional ecological studies – up to 6.5 feet below the surface – they detected additional root patterns in diverse climate zones and ecosystem types.

The scientists’ work focused on three key questions: How do plants acquire resources? What strategies do they employ to adapt to environmental change? And what are the implications for carbon storage?

Their findings were striking: nearly 20 percent of the studied ecosystems had roots that peaked twice across depth – a phenomenon called “bimodality.” In these cases, plants developed a second, deeper layer of roots, often aligning with nutrient-rich soil layers. This suggests that plants have been growing in previously unknown ways to exploit additional sustenance.

The study’s lead author, Mingzhen Lu, observes that the current understanding of roots is “literally too shallow.” By not looking deep enough, we may have overlooked a natural carbon storage mechanism deep underground. The research opens up new avenues for inquiry into how bimodal rooting patterns impact the dynamics of nutrient flow, water cycling, and long-term soil carbon stock.

As scientists and policymakers look to manage ecosystems in a rapidly changing climate, they must consider these overlooked deep soil layers. The study concludes that plants may already be naturally mitigating climate change more actively than we’ve realized – we just need to dig deeper to fully understand their potential.

The West Coast of the United States is no stranger to massive floods caused by atmospheric rivers. These powerful storms bring much-needed moisture to the region, but also pose a significant threat to communities and ecosystems. A new study has shed light on the hidden trigger behind these devastating events: wet soils that cannot absorb more water when a storm hits.

The research, published in the Journal of Hydrometeorology, analyzed over 43,000 atmospheric river storms across 122 watersheds on the West Coast between 1980 and 2023. The findings reveal that flood peaks were 2-4.5 times higher on average when soils were already wet. This means that even weaker storms can generate major floods if their precipitation meets a saturated Earth.

Lead author Mariana Webb, completing her Ph.D. at DRI and the University of Nevada, Reno, explained that flooding from any event is not just a function of storm size and magnitude but also depends on what’s happening on the land surface. The study demonstrates the key role that pre-event soil moisture can have in moderating flood events.

Interestingly, flood magnitudes do not increase linearly as soil moisture increases. There’s a critical threshold of soil moisture wetness above which you start to see much larger flows. This research also untangled the environmental conditions of regions where soil moisture has the largest influence on flooding.

In arid places like California and southwestern Oregon, storms that hit when soils are already saturated are more likely to cause floods. In contrast, in lush Washington and the interior Cascades and Sierra Nevada regions, watersheds tend to have deeper soils and snowpack, leading to a higher water storage capacity. Although soil saturation can still play a role in driving flooding in these areas, accounting for soil moisture is less valuable for flood management because soils are consistently wet or insulated by snow.

The study highlights the importance of integrating land surface conditions into impact assessments for atmospheric rivers. Webb worked with DRI ecohydrologist Christine Albano to produce the research, building on Albano’s extensive expertise studying atmospheric rivers, their risks, and their impacts on the landscape.

While soil saturation is widely recognized as a key factor in determining flood risk, Mari’s work helps to quantify the point at which this level of saturation leads to large increases in flood risk across different areas along the West Coast. Advances in weather forecasting allow us to see atmospheric rivers coming toward the coast several days before they arrive. By combining atmospheric river forecast information with knowledge of how close the soil moisture is to critical saturation levels for a given watershed, we can further improve flood early warning systems.

Increased monitoring in watersheds identified as high-risk, including real-time soil moisture observations, could significantly enhance early warning systems and flood management as atmospheric rivers become more frequent and intense. By tailoring flood risk evaluations to a specific watershed’s physical characteristics and climate, the study could improve flood-risk predictions.