The study of giant carnivorous dinosaurs has long been a source of fascination for scientists. A recent analysis of 18 species of predatory dinosaurs reveals that while some giants like the Tyrannosaurus rex were optimized for crushing prey, others, such as spinosaurs and allosaurs, had weaker bites and specialized in slashing and ripping flesh.

The findings, published in the journal Current Biology, demonstrate that meat-eating dinosaurs followed different evolutionary paths in terms of skull design and feeding style despite their similarly gigantic sizes. According to Dr. Andrew Rowe, a researcher at the University of Bristol, “Carnivorous dinosaurs took very different paths as they evolved into giants in terms of feeding biomechanics and possible behaviors.”

The research involved analyzing 3D scans of dinosaur skulls using CT technology and surface scanning. The scientists quantified the feeding performance and measured the bite strength across various species. They were surprised to find clear biomechanical divergence, with some dinosaurs having skulls that were optimized for high bite forces at the cost of higher skull stress.

In contrast, other giants like Giganotosaurus had relatively lighter bites. The findings show that being a predatory biped didn’t always equate to being a bone-crushing giant. Unlike T. rex, some dinosaurs, including spinosaurs and allosaurs, became giants while maintaining weaker bites more suited for slashing at prey and stripping flesh.

Dr. Rowe compares the feeding style of Allosaurus to that of a modern Komodo dragon, highlighting the diversity of dinosaur ecosystems and the specialization of different predators. The research was supported by funding from the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council.

The study provides new insights into the evolution of giant carnivorous dinosaurs and their feeding behaviors, offering a more nuanced understanding of these fascinating creatures.

The 10,000-mile march through fire that made dinosaurs possible is a remarkable story of survival and evolution. New research suggests that the forerunners of dinosaurs and crocodiles in the Triassic period were able to migrate across areas deemed completely inhospitable to life, paving the way for the rise of these iconic creatures.

A team of researchers from the University of Birmingham and University of Bristol has used a new method of geographical analysis to infer how these ancestral reptiles, known as archosauromorphs, dispersed following one of the most impactful climate events in Earth’s history – the end-Permian mass extinction. This event saw more than half of land-based animals and 81% of marine life die.

The first archosauromorphs were previously believed to only survive in certain parts of the globe due to extreme heat across the tropics, viewed by many paleontologists as a dead zone. However, by developing a new modelling technique based on landscape reconstructions and evolutionary trees, the team has discovered clues about how these reptiles moved around the world during the Triassic period.

The archosauromorphs that survived the extinction event rose to prominence in Earth’s ecosystems in the Triassic, leading to the evolution of dinosaurs. The team now suggests that their later success was in part due to their ability to migrate up to 10,000 miles across the tropical dead zone to access new ecosystems.

Dr Joseph Flannery-Sutherland from the University of Birmingham and corresponding author of the study said: “Amid the worst climatic event in Earth’s history, where more species died than at any period since, life still survived. We know that archosauromorphs as a group managed to come out of this event and over the Triassic period became one of the main players in shaping life thereafter.”

The researchers’ findings have significant implications for our understanding of how life on Earth evolved and adapted to changing environments. As Professor Michael Benton from the University of Bristol, senior author of the study, notes: “The evolution of life has been controlled at times by the environment, but it is difficult to integrate our limited and uncertain knowledge about the ancient landscape with our limited and uncertain knowledge about the ecology of extinct organisms.”

By combining fossils with reconstructed maps of the ancient world in the context of evolutionary trees, the researchers have provided a way of overcoming these challenges. Their work offers a new perspective on the remarkable story of how dinosaurs evolved to thrive in a world previously thought to be inhospitable to life.

The origin of life is one of humanity’s greatest mysteries. For centuries, scientists have sought to understand how the complex systems that govern our world emerged from the simple chemistry of the early Earth. A crucial step in this process is the replication of genetic material, which would have been carried by RNA (ribonucleic acid) molecules before DNA and proteins later took over.

Chemists at UCL and the MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology have made a groundbreaking discovery that brings us closer to understanding how life began. They’ve successfully recreated the conditions under which RNA might have replicated itself on early Earth, a key process in the origin of life.

The researchers used three-letter “triplet” RNA building blocks in water and added acid and heat, which separated the double helix structure that normally prevents RNA strands from replicating. By neutralizing and freezing the solution, they created liquid gaps between the ice crystals where the triplet building blocks could coat the RNA strands and prevent them from zipping back together, allowing replication to occur.

By repeating this cycle of changes in pH and temperature, which could plausibly occur in nature, the researchers were able to replicate RNA over and over again. This process produced RNA strands long enough to have a biological function and play a role in the origin of life.

The study’s lead author, Dr James Attwater, emphasized that replication is fundamental to biology. “In one sense, it is why we are here,” he said. “But there’s no trace in biology of the first replicator.”

The researchers believe that early life was run by RNA molecules, and their findings provide a possible explanation for how this process could have occurred before life began several billion years ago.

While the study focuses solely on the chemistry, the conditions they created could plausibly mimic those in freshwater ponds or lakes, especially in geothermal environments where heat from inside the Earth has reached the surface. However, this replication of RNA could not occur in freezing and thawing saltwater, as the presence of salt interferes with the freezing process and prevents RNA building blocks from reaching the concentration required to replicate RNA strands.

The origin of life is likely to have emerged out of a combination of RNA, peptides, enzymes, and barrier-forming lipids that can protect these ingredients from their environment. The researchers are uncovering clues about how life began, and their findings bring us closer to understanding this fundamental mystery.
In recent years, teams led by Dr John Sutherland and Professor Matthew Powner have demonstrated how chemistry could create many of the key molecules of life’s origin, including nucleotides, amino acids and peptides, simple lipids and precursors to some of the vitamins, from simple molecular building blocks likely abundant on the early Earth.

The latest study was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC), part of UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), as well as the Royal Society and the Volkswagen Foundation.